According to a report by KessbenTV, on Friday October 30, 2026, Football analyst Andy Kerm has sparked debate among football fans after strongly disagreeing with comparisons between Barcelona midfielder Gavi and Chelsea’s Ghanaian midfielder Moisés Caicedo.

Kerm believes the two players operate at different levels and possess different qualities, making direct comparisons between them an unfair assessment of their abilities.

He illustrated his position with a striking geographical analogy, saying that comparing Gavi to Caicedo is like comparing Accra to New Jersey.

His statement has added another dimension to the ongoing football discussions surrounding the qualities, playing styles and contributions of some of the world's prominent midfielders.

Speaking on Kessben Sports, Kerm argued that the Barcelona youngster and the Chelsea midfielder should not be placed in the same category when assessing their footballing abilities.

His comments suggest that he considers Gavi to be considerably superior to Caicedo in the comparison under discussion.

The statement has attracted attention because both players are regarded as important midfield figures at their respective clubs. Gavi has established himself as part of Barcelona's midfield setup, while Caicedo has become a significant presence in Chelsea's engine room.

Although the two footballers play in midfield, their individual characteristics, tactical responsibilities and approaches to the game provide different talking points for analysts and supporters.

Gavi is widely associated with his energy, aggressive pressing, technical ability and determination in midfield. Caicedo, on the other hand, is known for his defensive awareness, ball-winning ability, physical presence and capacity to protect his team's backline while helping to move possession forward.

Kerm's geographical comparison, in which he described the difference as being like comparing Accra to New Jersey, was a colourful way of communicating his position on the debate.

His remarks were made during a discussion on Kessben Sports, where football analysts regularly examine performances, players and developments across major European leagues.

The comments are likely to generate further arguments among Barcelona and Chelsea supporters, particularly those who believe that both midfielders deserve recognition for the different roles they perform for their respective teams.

For now, Kerm has made his position clear, insisting that comparing Gavi with Caicedo is a comparison he strongly disagrees with.