Retour
Pakistan cricket was running out of reasons to believe. Defeats had piled up, controversies had overshadowed performances, and repeated changes had left the team searching for stability. Just when another collapse seemed to capture everything wrong with Pakistan cricket, Shadab Khan produced an extraordinary rescue act, offering a struggling team a precious moment of hope.
Chasing 242 in Lahore, Pakistan slumped to 154-9, with defeat seemingly inevitable. Shadab remained unbeaten on 113 off 96 balls, guiding Pakistan to a remarkable one-wicket victory alongside Haris Rauf. Their unbroken 89-run partnership became the highest 10th-wicket stand in a successful men's ODI run chase, breaking a 51-year-old record.
Yet, the innings meant more than the numbers. At a time when Pakistan desperately needed someone to take responsibility, Shadab showed what composure, courage and belief could achieve. This was more than a miraculous escape; it was a reminder that Pakistan cricket still had something worth believing in.
Pakistan's problems have been building for years. The men's team have not won a senior men's ICC title since the 2017 Champions Trophy, and the prolonged wait has widened the gap between the country's rich cricketing heritage and its recent results.
Talent has rarely been the issue. Pakistan continue to produce players capable of changing matches single-handedly. What remains elusive is consistency — turning individual brilliance into collective success and maintaining stability through difficult periods.
The recent England tour brought those concerns into sharp focus. Following defeats in the first two Tests, Pakistan sent seven players home, replaced head coach Sarfaraz Ahmed with Mike Hesson and made further coaching changes. Internal inquiries surrounding Mohammad Rizwan and Imam-ul-Haq added to the uncertainty.
For a team needing clarity and cohesion, the upheaval only deepened the sense of drift. Once again, Pakistan cricket was making headlines for turmoil rather than performances.
That was the backdrop to Shadab's innings. Pakistan did not need another reminder of their problems. They needed someone to stand up when defeat seemed unavoidable. Shadab offered a different narrative, built on responsibility and the refusal to surrender.
Being the last recognised hope in a collapsing batting order brings a particular kind of pressure. Every wicket takes the opposition closer to victory, while the margin for error shrinks with every passing over.
Shadab resisted the temptation to chase the target recklessly. He rotated the strike, assessed the bowlers and picked his moments to attack. As wickets fell around him, he assumed greater responsibility without losing sight of the equation.
Pakistan needed aggression, but they also needed someone capable of thinking clearly under pressure. Shadab provided both, protecting his last-wicket partner while ensuring England could not settle into a comfortable rhythm.
His innings inevitably recalled Abdul Razzaq's remarkable 72-ball 109 against South Africa in Abu Dhabi in 2010. Chasing 287, Pakistan were staring at defeat when Razzaq launched a breathtaking counterattack, smashing 10 sixes and seven fours to secure a one-wicket victory with one ball remaining.
Razzaq's innings was an explosive display of power hitting. Shadab's required a different calculation: patience, strike management and the ability to protect the last man. Both, however, shared the defining quality of refusing to accept defeat when the odds were stacked against them.
Shadab's unbeaten 113 was also the highest individual score in men's ODIs by a batter coming in at No. 8 or lower. More importantly, he understood when to wait and when to seize the initiative.
The defining moment arrived when Shadab appeared to have exhausted his chances.
Batting on 97, he was given out leg-before-wicket by Gus Atkinson. The broadcaster showed that England won by 20 runs with Shadab devastated. England began celebrating, and Shadab seemed ready to walk away, unaware that the ball had taken an inside edge off his bat.
Rauf, however, urged his partner to review the decision. The replays vindicated his instinct, with UltraEdge confirming the inside edge and the decision overturned.
It was a small intervention with enormous consequences. In the heat of the moment, Shadab had missed a chance to challenge the decision without realising that he might have hit the ball. Rauf recognised it right away and insisted that the innings was not over.
The reprieve gave Pakistan's last pair another opportunity to complete a rescue that had seemed impossible moments earlier. Shadab responded by attacking Atkinson, moving closer to victory rather than allowing the reprieve to go to waste.
Rauf's contribution extended beyond the review. He stayed alongside Shadab, held his nerve and struck the winning boundary. As the ball raced to the fence, Rauf flung his bat into the air and sprinted away in delight, while Shadab was mobbed and lifted by his teammates. At Gaddafi Stadium, disbelief gave way to unrestrained joy as Pakistan completed a victory that had seemed impossible only a few overs earlier.
Shadab supplied the brilliance; Rauf provided the conviction and finishing touch. Their partnership offered a glimpse of something Pakistan have too often lacked during difficult periods: trust, composure and the ability to support one another when the pressure is at its highest.
The celebrations were deserved, but they should not obscure the batting collapse that made Shadab's heroics necessary in the first place. Pakistan's top order failed to lay the foundation for a manageable chase, leaving the lower order with an almost impossible task. Shadab's brilliance rescued the team, but such innings are rare, and Pakistan cannot build a winning formula around the expectation that someone will produce a miracle every time the specialist batters falter.
One extraordinary performance cannot resolve years of instability. Pakistan still need greater consistency, a settled direction and a batting order capable of taking responsibility. The wait for another ICC title remains a reminder that individual brilliance must translate into sustained collective success.
Shadab did precisely what the situation demanded. He took responsibility after the specialist batters had fallen, adapted to the demands of the chase and kept fighting when defeat appeared inevitable. Rauf's intervention showed how a teammate's conviction can turn a remarkable individual effort into a completed rescue.
Pakistan cricket remains in a deep hole, and Shadab has not pulled it out single-handedly. He has provided a lifeline, not a cure. The real test will be whether his innings inspires the team to address the shortcomings that left them reeling, rather than allowing the result to paper over them.
Pakistan should celebrate Shadab's achievement, but they must also confront the reasons it was needed. Not every match will offer a rescue act of this magnitude, and not every player will turn a near-certain defeat into victory. If Pakistan are to move forward, their top order must give such heroes a platform to build on, rather than repeatedly leaving them with a mountain to climb.
- Ends