flag
back Back
Arsenal sent clear new penalty verdict in call for law change
Mikel Arteta happy with Arsenal victory over Hull and his ‘effective’ captain Martin Odegaard

Arsenal were denied a penalty against Hull after the officials incorrectly applied the laws of the game.

That is the view of former referee Dermot Gallagher, who said of the incident: “ethically it is right but by the laws it is wrong”.

The Gunners beat Hull 1-0 on Saturday thanks to Martin Odegaard’s second-half goal and will spend the international break sitting five points clear at the top of the Premier League.

However, there was a controversial moment in the first half at the Emirates Stadium when the score remained 0-0 and Arsenal were not awarded a penalty.

Referee Farai Hallam stopped play to go to the monitor and assess whether Nobel Mendy’s pull of Kai Havertz’s shirt in the box was a foul.

It was decided that while Havertz was fouled and the contact was worthy of a penalty, the Arsenal striker was offside and so a free-kick was given to Hull.

That went against the laws of the game, which say the offside should have been irrelevant as Havertz was not attempting to play the ball or challenging an opponent for it.

No penalty: Arsenal’s Kai Havertz falls under the challenge of Nobel Mendy against Hull

Getty

Gallagher believes that Arsenal should have been awarded a spot-kick, but expressed sympathy for the officials involved.

He claimed that “common sense” would suggest that Havertz was offside and so a penalty could not be awarded, as he called for the rules to be tweaked to avoid such confusion.

“The law says that if a player in an offside position is fouled before the offside occurs, a foul should be given and therefore a penalty,” Gallagher said on Sky Sports.

“In law, you should give a penalty. It is quite clear, the foul occurred before. But we talk about common sense. Havertz is 100 per cent offside. His starting position is offside.

“Three things he can’t do: he can’t play the ball as he’d be interfering, he can’t challenge an opponent and he can’t go in front of the goalkeeper. He is offside and the net result should be a penalty.

“Common sense is not allowed. When you think of it morally, can you really give a penalty for a player who is never in an onside position? He can’t play the ball.

“The process of VAR was fantastic. The assistant calls offside the minute the ball comes in. The start position for the assistant was always offside.

“Ethically it is right but by law it is wrong. There is scope for tightening it up [the laws].”

You may like

CRY 1-3 LIV: Liverpool Superstar Wins MOTM Award After His Superb Performance

AsanteDave 3 hours ago

Beautiful Football Match To Watch

nccegh.org 1 day ago

GPL Week 10: Medeama go clear as Hearts climb second, Kotoko suffer Berekum heartbreak

Graphic Online 31 minutes ago

It’s not the mistakes and it’s not “desire and intensity” Manchester City STILL have a Rodri problem

FourFourTwo 2 hours ago

WSL Table After Manchester United Won 1-0, Chelsea Drew 1-1 And Arsenal Won 2-1

Peace829404 3 hours ago

Goalkeeper displayed highest IQ ever to let indirect free-kick go straight in

sportbible.com 2 hours ago

MNU 4-4 AVL: Man United Superstar Wins Man of The Match Award After His Superb Display

Peace829404 3 hours ago

Nebojsa Kapor calls for improvement in Hearts of Oak's positional play despite big Heart of Lions...

Ghanasoccernet.com 27 minutes ago

USM Alger outclass Sundowns to win CAF Super Cup

Graphic Online 1 hour ago

Ligue 1 McDonald’s MD10 Recap: PSG maintain lead, Lille move 2nd as Marseille extend winning run

Pulse.com.gh 29 minutes ago