Retour
Derek McInnes has enjoyed considerable praise for Rangers’ recent revival, and rightly so. However, the Dundee debacle has raised some very uncomfortable questions about his decision making. In particular, the sudden inclusion of Badredine Bouanani looks suspiciously like a response to pressure from Algerian journalists. The timing of the Derek McInnes pressure controversy certainly raises eyebrows.
Algerian journalists had been making quite a fuss about Bouanani’s lack of playing time at Ibrox. Indeed, reports from his homeland complained that the winger had barely featured under McInnes despite arriving from Stuttgart to gain regular football.
Furthermore, the Algerian media questioned whether Rangers were damaging his development and international prospects. The criticism grew increasingly vocal, with journalists clearly unhappy about the treatment of their international player.
Then, rather conveniently, McInnes suddenly handed Bouanani his opportunity against Dundee.
Now, we cannot prove that the Algerian criticism directly influenced McInnes. However, the timing hardly escapes attention. After weeks of overlooking the winger, the Rangers manager suddenly changed his approach immediately following the complaints.
McInnes subsequently presented the change as a tactical adjustment designed to accommodate Min Su Kim. Apparently, the Rangers boss wanted to alter his system to get the South Korean into the middle.
However, that explanation does not entirely convince us.
Rangers had just enjoyed seven consecutive victories and nine wins from ten. Therefore, why suddenly dismantle a successful formula? Why abandon the approach that had restored confidence throughout Ibrox?
Moreover, the changes hardly improved Rangers’ attacking football. Ryan Naderi struggled alone up front, Kevin Kelsy sat out and the entire system lacked cohesion.
Bouanani himself tried to make things happen. Indeed, he arguably offered more than most of his teammates. Nevertheless, the overall tactical experiment failed spectacularly.
The worrying possibility is that McInnes allowed outside criticism to influence his selection decisions. Certainly, the sequence of events invites that interpretation.
A Rangers manager must make decisions according to what benefits Rangers. Algerian journalists naturally want their international player involved. However, their priorities do not necessarily match those of the Ibrox club.
Furthermore, McInnes had absolutely no reason to abandon a winning formula simply to accommodate individuals. His Rangers team selection had already delivered considerable success.
If the manager genuinely believed the new system offered improvements, the performance at Dundee provided a pretty emphatic answer. Indeed, Rangers’ squad selection problems have already attracted considerable attention.
Ultimately, Rangers dropped two precious points and surrendered another opportunity to strengthen their Scottish Premiership title challenge.
Steven Pressley’s Dundee exposed the tactical shortcomings while McInnes failed to respond quickly enough.
Consequently, the Derek McInnes pressure question deserves scrutiny. Did the Algerian complaints influence his thinking, or did he independently arrive at an unfortunate tactical decision?
Either way, Rangers suffered the consequences.
The Ibrox manager cannot afford further experiments that undermine a successful team. Above all, he must demonstrate that his own football judgement, rather than outside noise, dictates Rangers’ selections.
McInnes arrived at Ibrox promising to deliver success. His appointment followed Danny Rohl’s departure, while his early struggles prompted serious questions about Rangers’ identity.
Nevertheless, the Old Firm League Cup triumph demonstrated what his team could achieve. Even after European disappointment, the manager eventually found a winning formula.
And crucially, the authority McInnes received upon his appointment means responsibility for these decisions rests firmly with him.